On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 06:27:41PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > Nothing wrong about that, if we don't go a long way to make additional > changes in the various admin packages (isdn, pcmcia comes to mind). > > I was always a supporter of the latest and greatest kernel as a binary > package in extra. >
If we look at why the latest kernel should go in, it's most likely for the new hardware support, not the other new features. New hardware support seems to be a reasonable justification for allowing new versions into stable/frozen if there is also an older version there for the rest of us to fall back on in case it's a lemon.
