Will Barton wrote: > I like the idea a lot, but I have a question about version numbers. Potato > is > 2.2, so would you call 2.2.1? I'm assuming it would be more than just 2.2r2, > etc.
Yes, that makes sense to me. > It would be better to have these included in another release with our > blessings > than added in at your own risk, IMHO. A 2.4 kernel simply should not be > included in THE potato release, however. There should be no question about > that > simply because of the major differences between 2.2 and 2.4. Yes, that's what I proposed. -- see shy jo
