On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:49:27PM -0700, Michael Meskes wrote: > > Could anyone please explain this to me? Did Corel do anything to their files > > that makes apt think it has to upgrade although its up-to-date? Or is this > > a bug in apt? > > I see this quite often, so it is a bug in the curret apt lib. aptitude is > even more vulnerable to this... at least the cache does work so u d/l it > only once.
Any idea what makes aptitude in particular more vulnerable? I can toss it into the TODO queue. [1] Daniel [1] not that anything is being dequeued at the moment..*sigh*.. -- /----------------- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----------------\ | f u cn rd ths, | "The spork is strong with him..." -- Fluble | | u cn gt a jb s | | | a cmptr prgrmr. | | \----------------- The Turtle Moves! -- http://www.lspace.org ----------------/