On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:36:12PM -0400, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > was heard to say: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:49:27PM -0700, Michael Meskes wrote: > > > Could anyone please explain this to me? Did Corel do anything to their > > > files > > > that makes apt think it has to upgrade although its up-to-date? Or is this > > > a bug in apt? > > > > I see this quite often, so it is a bug in the curret apt lib. aptitude is > > even more vulnerable to this... at least the cache does work so u d/l it > > only once. > > Any idea what makes aptitude in particular more vulnerable? I can toss > it into the TODO queue. [1]
(especially since this looks like just the well-established behavior of downloading changed packages..) Daniel -- /----------------- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----------------\ | If you're reading | "I've struggled with reality for thirty-five years, but | | this, you have too | I'm glad to say that I finally won." | | much free time. | -- _Harvey_ | \---- News without the $$ -- National Public Radio -- http://www.npr.org ----/
