On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 01:58:21PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > You completely misparsed my answer/suggestion. My suggestion is to follow
Sorry for not having been clear: I did not misunderstood your suggestion, in fact ... > > To fix that, it seems to me that the most reasonable solution advanced > > in the thread is to add a proper "Description" field to source package ... the implicit subject here is you, I took your suggestion as the most reasonable one (and yes, I should have made the subject explicit). If everybody else on the thread is on the same line ... even better :-) So, do we have a roadmap of what should be changed so that we can keep track of this? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature