Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> dpkg-dev should Depends: build-essential, or at the very least,
>> Recommends: it; in the latter case, dpkg-checkbuilddeps should check
>> for the presence of the package.  Otherwise, people not running
>> buildd's may well discover that they can't build their packages (and
>> I've had some interesting bug reports against devscripts which arise
>> from this bug).
> 
> This would be equivalent to making dpkg-dev to depend on
> 
> libc6-dev | libc-dev, gcc (>= 3:3.3), g++ (>= 3:3.3)
> 
> which are the dependencies of build-essential which are not already satisfied
> by dpkg-dev itself or its own dependencies.

Agreed.  However, making dpkg-checkbuilddeps do the appropriate checks
seems to be the logical solution.

Cheers,
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt


Reply via email to