debian-dpkg  

Messages by Thread

• failed powerpc build of dpkg 1.17.14 Debian buildds
• failed kfreebsd-amd64 build of dpkg 1.17.14 Debian buildds
• failed armhf build of dpkg 1.17.14 Debian buildds
• failed sparc build of dpkg 1.17.14 Debian buildds
• failed kfreebsd-i386 build of dpkg 1.17.14 Debian buildds
• failed amd64 build of dpkg 1.17.14 Debian buildds
  • Re: failed amd64 build of dpkg 1.17.14 Guillem Jover
• failed s390x build of dpkg 1.17.14 Debian buildds
• dpkg_1.17.14_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of dpkg_1.17.14_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
  • Processing of dpkg_1.17.14_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Accepted dpkg 1.17.14 (source all) into unstable Guillem Jover
• [PATCH v2 0/2] Running maintscripts for a different architecture Andreas Oberritter
  • [PATCH v2 2/2] update-alternatives: Implement offline mode Andreas Oberritter
  • [PATCH v2 1/2] dpkg: Add option --cross-bootstrap Andreas Oberritter
• [PATCH] Man page for --cmdpart feature. Clemens Fruhwirth
• xattrs support Dmitry Falko
  • Re: xattrs support Dmitry Falko
  • Re: xattrs support Mimi Zohar
  • Re: xattrs support Guillem Jover
• Re: Bug#761219: debian-policy: document versioned Provides Guillem Jover
  • Re: Bug#761219: debian-policy: document versioned Provides Dominic Hargreaves
• [PATCH] Add --cmdpart to filter processes by argv elements. Clemens Fruhwirth
  • Re: [PATCH] Add --cmdpart to filter processes by argv elements. Guillem Jover
  • Re: [PATCH] Add --cmdpart to filter processes by argv elements. Clemens Fruhwirth
• What is the default value for the Multi-Arch field? Johannes Schauer
  • Re: What is the default value for the Multi-Arch field? Thomas Hood
  • Re: What is the default value for the Multi-Arch field? Johannes Schauer
  • Re: [Multiarch-devel] What is the default value for the Multi-Arch field? Steve Langasek
• dpkg 1.17.13 MIGRATED to testing Debian testing watch
• [RFC PATCH 0/2] Running maintscripts for a different architecture Andreas Oberritter
  • [RFC PATCH 1/2] dpkg: Add option --cross-bootstrap Andreas Oberritter
  • [RFC PATCH 2/2] update-alternatives: Implement offline mode Andreas Oberritter
  • Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Running maintscripts for a different architecture Guillem Jover
  • Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Running maintscripts for a different architecture Andreas Oberritter
• Why is dpkg trying to write a file '//..dpkg-tmp'? sepero...@gmx.com
  • Re: Why is dpkg trying to write a file '//..dpkg-tmp'? Guillem Jover
• Re: tlsdate_0.0.7-1.1~bpo70+1_source.changes REJECTED Holger Levsen
• dpkg_1.17.13_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of dpkg_1.17.13_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
  • Processing of dpkg_1.17.13_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Accepted dpkg 1.17.13 (source all) into unstable Guillem Jover
• Re: [dpkg] 02/04: dpkg-shlibdeps: Do not unnecessarily interpolate strings Raphael Hertzog
• dpkg-source --commit fails to find local changes Neil Williams
  • Re: dpkg-source --commit fails to find local changes Guillem Jover
  • Re: dpkg-source --commit fails to find local changes Bernhard R. Link
  • Re: dpkg-source --commit fails to find local changes Sebastian Ramacher
  • Re: dpkg-source --commit fails to find local changes Guillem Jover
  • Re: dpkg-source --commit fails to find local changes Guillem Jover
• Re: propagating the value of the build-profiles field to Packages and Sources files Johannes Schauer
  • Re: propagating the value of the build-profiles field to Packages and Sources files Guillem Jover
• dpkg_1.17.12_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Accepted dpkg 1.17.12 (source all) into unstable Guillem Jover
• Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-binaries » i386 #230 Jenkins Team at Grml
• Processing of dpkg_1.17.12_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
  • Processing of dpkg_1.17.12_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• [PATCH] Make Dpkg::Source::Archive use tar --format=gnu Jan Blunck
  • Re: [PATCH] Make Dpkg::Source::Archive use tar --format=gnu Guillem Jover
• [PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Remove stackprotectorstrong arch blacklist Romain Francoise
  • Re: [PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Remove stackprotectorstrong arch blacklist Guillem Jover
• Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-binaries » i386 #228 Jenkins Team at Grml
  • Re: Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-binaries » i386 #228 Guillem Jover
  • Re: Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-binaries » i386 #228 Michael Prokop
• failed kfreebsd-amd64 build of dpkg 1.17.11 Debian buildds
  • Re: failed kfreebsd-amd64 build of dpkg 1.17.11 Guillem Jover
• failed kfreebsd-i386 build of dpkg 1.17.11 Debian buildds
• dpkg_1.17.11_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of dpkg_1.17.11_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
  • Processing of dpkg_1.17.11_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Accepted dpkg 1.17.11 (source all) into unstable Guillem Jover
• [RFC PATCH 0/3] Including file signatures in .deb packages] Mimi Zohar
  • [RFC PATCH 2/3] Temporarily define a deb helper dh_sha256sums Mimi Zohar
  • [RFC PATCH 1/3] Define a new debhelper dh_installfile-sigs and postinst autoscript Mimi Zohar
  • [RFC PATCH 3/3] Include sample script named ima-signhashes.sh Mimi Zohar
  • Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Including file signatures in .deb packages] Guillem Jover
  • Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Including file signatures in .deb packages] Mimi Zohar
• Jenkins build became unstable: dpkg-binaries » i386 #226 Jenkins Team at Grml
  • Re: Jenkins build became unstable: dpkg-binaries » i386 #226 Guillem Jover
  • Jenkins build is back to stable : dpkg-binaries » i386 #227 Jenkins Team at Grml
• Jenkins build became unstable: dpkg-binaries » amd64 #226 Jenkins Team at Grml
  • Jenkins build is back to stable : dpkg-binaries » amd64 #227 Jenkins Team at Grml
• runit not buildable, only build-dependency is arch qualified peter green
  • Re: runit not buildable, only build-dependency is arch qualified Steve Langasek
  • Re: runit not buildable, only build-dependency is arch qualified Gerrit Pape
  • Re: runit not buildable, only build-dependency is arch qualified Wookey
• debsig-verify_0.10_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of debsig-verify_0.10_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
  • Processing of debsig-verify_0.10_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Debian binary diff Agustin Henze
  • Re: Debian binary diff Cyril Brulebois
  • Re: Debian binary diff Agustin Henze
• Congratulations Beneficiary undp
• Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles Johannes Schauer
  • Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles Philipp Kern
  • Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles Johannes Schauer
  • Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles Philipp Kern
  • Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles Johannes Schauer
  • Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles Cyril Brulebois
  • Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles Johannes Schauer
  • Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles Cyril Brulebois
  • Re: backport of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles Johannes Schauer
• Polish translation actualisation Łukasz
  • Re: Polish translation actualisation Guillem Jover
• dpkg-source unpack failures Jakub Wilk
  • Re: dpkg-source unpack failures Guillem Jover
  • Re: dpkg-source unpack failures David Suárez
  • Re: dpkg-source unpack failures David Suárez
  • Re: dpkg-source unpack failures Guillem Jover
  • Re: dpkg-source unpack failures Adam D. Barratt
• [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Romain Francoise
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Guillem Jover
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Romain Francoise
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Romain Francoise
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Kees Cook
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Romain Francoise
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Kees Cook
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Moritz Muehlenhoff
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Russ Allbery
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Romain Francoise
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Niels Thykier
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Moritz Mühlenhoff
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Niels Thykier
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Michael Gilbert
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Michael Gilbert
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Romain Francoise
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Michael Gilbert
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Michael Gilbert
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Guillem Jover
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] dpkg-buildflags: Switch to -fstack-protector-strong Moritz Muehlenhoff
• dpkg_1.15.11_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new, oldstable-proposed-updates Debian FTP Masters
• Accepted dpkg 1.15.11 (source amd64 all) Guillem Jover
• Fresh blood Vladislav Vysokikh
• dpkg_1.16.15_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates Debian FTP Masters
• Accepted dpkg 1.16.15 (source amd64 all) Guillem Jover
• Which version/change in dpkg made it fully honour file modes? Michael Tautschnig
  • Re: Which version/change in dpkg made it fully honour file modes? Guillem Jover
  • Re: Which version/change in dpkg made it fully honour file modes? Michael Tautschnig
  • Re: Which version/change in dpkg made it fully honour file modes? Michael Tautschnig
  • Re: Which version/change in dpkg made it fully honour file modes? Guillem Jover
• dpkg 1.17.10 MIGRATED to testing Debian testing watch
• dpkg_1.16.15_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new Debian FTP Masters
• dpkg_1.15.11_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of dpkg_1.16.15_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of dpkg_1.15.11_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• debsig-verify_0.9_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of debsig-verify_0.9_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
  • Processing of debsig-verify_0.9_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• dpkg_1.17.10_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of dpkg_1.17.10_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
  • Processing of dpkg_1.17.10_amd64.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Accepted dpkg 1.17.10 (source amd64 all) Guillem Jover
• Re: Commit mails to debian-dpkg-cvs mailing list dropped somewhere Guillem Jover
• Wanted to learn hacking Jagtar
• Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards Bernhard R. Link
  • Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards Russ Allbery
  • Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards Bernhard R. Link
  • Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards Guillem Jover
  • Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards Bernhard R. Link
  • Re: Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards Balint Reczey
  • Re: Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards Colin Watson
  • Re: Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards Bálint Réczey
  • Re: Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards Bálint Réczey
  • Re: Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards Bill Allombert
  • Re: Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards Colin Watson
  • Re: Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards David Kalnischkies
  • Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards James Clarke
  • Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards Julian Andres Klode
  • Re: Bug#748936: apt doesnt understand architecture wildcards jrtc27
• cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: [Multiarch-devel] cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages Jakub Wilk
  • Re: [Multiarch-devel] cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: [Multiarch-devel] cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages Jakub Wilk
  • Re: [Multiarch-devel] cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: [Multiarch-devel] cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages Jonathan Nieder
  • Re: [Multiarch-devel] cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: [Multiarch-devel] cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: [Multiarch-devel] cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: [Multiarch-devel] cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages Raphael Hertzog
  • Re: [Multiarch-devel] cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: [Multiarch-devel] cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages Guillem Jover
  • Re: [Multiarch-devel] cross-architecture conflicts or equivalent for libc packages Aurelien Jarno
• Re: stable update of dpkg (>= 1.17.2) and apt (>= 0.9.16.1) for build profiles Guillem Jover
• Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-source #262 Jenkins Team at Grml
  • Re: Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-source #262 Guillem Jover
  • Re: Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-source #262 Michael Prokop
  • Re: Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-source #262 Guillem Jover
  • Build failed in Jenkins: dpkg-source #263 Jenkins Team at Grml
  • Jenkins build is back to normal : dpkg-source #264 Jenkins Team at Grml
• Re: Bug#747261: apt: Please add support for cross-architecture conflicts David Kalnischkies
  • Re: Bug#747261: apt: Please add support for cross-architecture conflicts Guillem Jover
  • Re: Bug#747261: apt: Please add support for cross-architecture conflicts Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: Bug#747261: apt: Please add support for cross-architecture conflicts Johannes Schauer
  • Re: Bug#747261: apt: Please add support for cross-architecture conflicts Aurelien Jarno
• sculpture art chinamarblestatue
• dpkg_1.15.9_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new, oldstable-proposed-updates Debian FTP Masters
• dpkg_1.15.10_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new, oldstable-proposed-updates Debian FTP Masters
• Accepted dpkg 1.15.10 (source amd64 all) Guillem Jover
• Accepted dpkg 1.15.9 (source amd64 all) Guillem Jover
• Re: Dpkg translation schedule and current issues Guillem Jover
  • Re: Dpkg translation schedule and current issues Helge Kreutzmann

• Later messages