Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:20:24 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#238156: dpkg-dev: dpkg-gencontrol 
ignore Depends: field]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2004 16:37:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 15 08:37:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from agrenoble-203-1-12-164.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr 
(localhost.localdomain) [81.51.62.164] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1B2v62-00018y-00; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:37:46 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by localhost.localdomain (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
i2FGbiFl031462;
        Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:37:44 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by localhost.localdomain (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) id i2FGbhGv031460;
        Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:37:43 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Cl=E9ment_=27nodens=27_Hermann?=
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg-dev: dpkg-gencontrol ignore Depends: field
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.52
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:37:43 +0100
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.10.20
Severity: important

dpkg-gencontrol ignore Depends field in debian/control if a variable
such as ${shlibs:Depends} or ${perl:Depends} is used. Everything is fine
when specifying package names without variables.

exemple : 
if I have 
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${perl:Depends}, iptables
in debian/control, dpkg-gencontrol -O does not show any Depends: field.

but if I put :
Depends: iptables
it works.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22-vanilla-1-k7-evms-freeswan
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

Versions of packages dpkg-dev depends on:
ii  binutils                   2.14.90.0.7-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  cpio                       2.5-1.1       GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii  make                       3.80-6        The GNU version of the "make" util
ii  patch                      2.5.9-1       Apply a diff file to an original
ii  perl [perl5]               5.8.3-2       Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  perl-modules               5.8.3-2       Core Perl modules.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 238156-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2004 18:20:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 15 10:20:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1B2whr-0001Ky-00; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:20:55 -0800
Received: from mizar.alcor.net ([68.64.159.24]) by mta10.adelphia.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:20:24 -0500
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 4.30)
        id 1B2whM-0002Ld-7x
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:20:24 -0800
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:20:24 -0800
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#238156: dpkg-dev: dpkg-gencontrol ignore 
Depends: field]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

----- Forwarded message from Clement nodens Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----

Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:10:07 +0100
From: Clement nodens Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#238156: dpkg-dev: dpkg-gencontrol ignore Depends: field

Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 05:37:43PM +0100, Cl?ment 'nodens' Hermann wrote:
>
>
>>Package: dpkg-dev
>>Version: 1.10.20
>>Severity: important
>>
>>dpkg-gencontrol ignore Depends field in debian/control if a variable
>>such as ${shlibs:Depends} or ${perl:Depends} is used. Everything is fine
>>when specifying package names without variables.
>>
>>exemple : 
>>if I have 
>>Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${perl:Depends}, iptables
>>in debian/control, dpkg-gencontrol -O does not show any Depends: field.
>>
>>but if I put :
>>Depends: iptables
>>it works.
>
>
>Works fine here:
>
>mizar:[/tmp/hello-2.1.1] grep Depends debian/control 
>Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, foo
>mizar:[/tmp/hello-2.1.1] dpkg-gencontrol -O |grep Depends
>dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
>Depends: foo
>
>Perhaps you can show how to reproduce the problem exactly.
>


delog and relog fixed the problem !?
Maybe an environment problem ?





-- 
Cl?ment 'nodens' Hermann
- "L'air pur ? c'est pas en RL, ?a ? c'est pas hors charte ?"
Jean in L'Histoire des Pingouins, http://tnemeth.free.fr/fmbl/linuxsf/

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
 - mdz


Reply via email to