* sean finney: > as a plus, it would drastically reduce the amount of code in dpkg. the > hundreds of lines of code dedicated toe > scanning/reading/writing/parsing/representing the various *.list > *.md5sums etc could be reduced to a small number of sql queries.
And other information could be presented as virtual tables (once upstream has settled the API), which might lead to further code reduction. > so, what's the general consensus on this? yea or nay? My experience with SQLite 3 has been very pleasant, but I don't know much about the dpkg codebase. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
