Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the other hand one could argue that dpkg-buildpackage should
> intentionally remain simple and that people are expected to write
> their own wrappers or replacements if they need.
>
> What do you think?
I personally think it ought to be kept simple since is very easy to
write other more "feature-rich" wrappers around it.
It needs to support all basic features of dpkg but no more then that.
That is my personal point of view.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
