On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 02:13:41AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On the other hand one could argue that dpkg-buildpackage should > intentionally remain simple and that people are expected to write > their own wrappers or replacements if they need.
I like this thought. On the other hand, something like integrating dpkg-sig(s) functionality might be a good thing to do. Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
