reassign 542843 dpkg-dev thanks Am Dienstag, den 02.02.2010, 17:38 +0100 schrieb Philipp Kern: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 05:23:07PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:05:33AM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: > > > Just tested 'sbuild -As' and couldn't reproduce the problem. The > > > orig.tar.gz was > > > included in the changes file. > > See the attached build log and changes as a proof. > > `--force-orig-source' > > > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.59.0 (02 Aug 2009) on hp > > > > ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ > > ║ computer-janitor 1.14.1-1 (amd64) 02 Feb 2010 > > 15:59 ║ > > ╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝ > > I don't think that's sbuild's fault but rather dpkg's. I suspect because > there's most likely a revision < 1.14.1-1 and >> 1.14.1 with an Ubuntu > version, > no? I, as dpkg, would then assume that the source for 1.14.1 is already > uploaded.
Reassigning this to dpkg-dev. In my opinion, the .orig.tar.* should always be included in a -1 release, even if there has already been an -0ubuntu1 release. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org