J�r�me Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > G�rkan Seng�n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi Miles, > > > >> I expect one potential problem is that of user confusion -- if > >> somebody sees an "emacs.app" package they'll probably think it's at > >> least a semi-recent version of emacs. > > > > Wait you think this 20 version is not semi-recent? > > What do you think is this, then? > > http://www.linuks.mine.nu/openstep/emacs.png > > (People still use 18.x!) > > For what benefit do they still use 18.x? > > >> For the same reason, dealing > >> with bugs becomes more complicated. > > > > It's not you who has to deal with these bugs, are you? > > I will deal with the bugs of my packages, so will my upstreams. > > Sticking with 20 and dealing with its bugs while they have been fixed > in 21 and greater is plain silly. > > > Emacs.app is an object, it's not depending or being depended on > > by other Emacs packages in Debian. > > Hopefully. > > -- > J�r�me Marant
Sorry to jump in so late... So all elisp packages won't have to interoperate with it? There's no way I'm supporting emacs20 elisp now... Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
