hi, On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:23:00AM +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: > > should be more like > > arm-gnu-source because the patch is named arm-gnu-source.dpatch. > > Can you make a binary-only upload with that change? I don't think it's
sure. should i add an entry in the changelog, probably, what version number? 1:3.0.4ds2-0pre020210-0.1 or 1:3.0.4ds2-0pre020210.1 ? or what else is reasonable? > worth doing a new source version and forcing all other arches to rebuild > for this, considering that we will probably want to do a new upload > anyway when GCC 3.0.4 is released in a few days' time. The > arm-gnu(s)-source patch will be obsoleted by the 3.0.4 .orig.tar.gz > anyway. i know it would be rather silly just with this change. that also means an official 3.0.4 is not that far away? so long Othmar