Your message dated 26 Feb 2002 11:53:17 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line this is fixed now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2002 08:42:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 02:42:10 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h062040195100.dyn.cm.kabsi.at (davinci.tron.priv.at)
[62.40.195.100]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16bdwX-0007tm-00; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 02:42:10 -0600
Received: by davinci.tron.priv.at (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7299DA7A0; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:42:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:42:07 +0100
From: Othmar Pasteka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: unstable/arm: typo in arm specific debian_patches
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.1421356
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4ds2-0pre020210
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
you have a small typo in the arm specific section of rules.patch.
you wrote
ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),arm)
debian_patches += arm-const-double arm-tune arm-gnus-source
endif
should be more like
arm-gnu-source because the patch is named arm-gnu-source.dpatch.
so long
Othmar
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux davinci 2.4.16 #1 Wed Nov 28 19:31:04 CET 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 134051-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2002 11:53:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 26 05:53:20 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-62-3-66-203.zen.co.uk (mail.nexus.co.uk) [62.3.66.203]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16fgAZ-0007uB-00; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 05:53:19 -0600
Received: from dsl-62-3-66-201.zen.co.uk ([62.3.66.201] helo=mill.nexus.co.uk)
by mail.nexus.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16fgAg-0004SN-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:53:26 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
by mill.nexus.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16fgAX-0001aK-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:53:17 +0000
Subject: this is fixed now
From: Phil Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1
Date: 26 Feb 2002 11:53:17 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The offending patch is removed in 3.0.4-1
p.
