On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 11:57:41PM +0100, Peter Koellner wrote: > On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > > > > well, and then take the fact that dpkg gcc 2.95.4 is derived from the > > > original > > > sources of gcc 2.95.2.. > > > > > > > I have no idea where you get this from. The compiler core is straight > > from GCC's 2.95.4, plus some CVS patches. Yeah, maybe parts like libg++ > > are still the same version as from 2.95.2, but that's not the compiler. > > i have that from http://packages.debian.org/testing/devel/gcc.html, > at the Source Code line: > > Source Code: > [dsc] > [gcc_2.95.2.orig.tar.gz] > [gcc_2.95.2-20.diff.gz] > || [dsc] > [gcc-defaults_0.16.tar.gz]
That page appears to be somewhere buggy. -- .----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=-----. / Ben Collins -- Debian GNU/Linux -- WatchGuard.com \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
