On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:34:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > ok, applied for 3.5.
Nice, thanks! > not for 3.4 at this point of the release cycle. Yep, much better. (when I started working on the gcc-3.4 package, I didn't expect it would get into sarge) Since our schedule is to release with sarge+1, integrating the fixes for gcc-3.4 might not be necessary at all. Do you think sarge+1 will use 3.4 or 3.5 as default compiler? > > - Generate *_no_archs variables with type-handling and use them for > > for m4's -D parameters. [3] > > I found that much easier to read: > > ada_no_archs := $(shell \ > type-handling -n `echo $(ada_no_cpus) | tr ' ' ,` any; \ > type-handling -n any `echo $(ada_no_systems) | tr ' ' ,`) Make sure the newline characters that t-h generates are still stripped. I'll try to check gcc-3.5 periodicaly to ensure my change didn't introduce any breakage. Could you roll out a new upload? (with fresh upstream CVS) -- Robert Millan (Debra and Ian) (Gnu's Not (UNiplexed Information and Computing System))/\ (kernel of *(Berkeley Software Distribution))