Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> reassign 358644 autoconf
> thanks
>
> * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-23 17:32]:
>> Can someone please comment whether this is a compiler bug (I think
>> so) or whether autoconf needs to be changed.
>
> I talked to Andrew Pinski of GCC and he told me the behaviour of GCC
> 4.1 is correct:
>
> 19:22 < pinskia> tbm: I think the warning is ok, and the link failure is the
> best
> 19:23 < tbm> pinskia: so autoconf needs to get fixed...
> 19:23 < pinskia> yes
I'd disagree. I don't see the point in producing an object file that
is impossible to link. Or is it possible under some circumstances?
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
