* Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-03 09:16]: > | up with some kind of (small) testcase. > > As John and I stated, 'small' is hard to define in the context of large-ish > C++ applications / libraries. The C++ source of RQuantLib are small (around > 60kb) and I could probably trim that further for an example ... but it would > still need QuantLib itself which is rather larger. Would that be helpful or > not?
s/small/self-contained/ then. Do you have some example where the linking process of some c++ files takes ages, without linking them against some external library? That would make things much easier imho. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
