On 08.05.2012 14:44, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> (07/05/2012): >> see my email to -release. It's ahead of the freeze, and the fix rate for >> the build failures shows that all these issues can be fixed even before >> the freeze. It is not a transition which requires binNMU's itself (except >> for the libobjc stuff), and shouldn't affect other ongoing transitions. > > Wrong. At least strigi, gnome-commander, and hugin are getting hit.
stop blaming the compiler for unrelated build failures. You did so already yesterday: <mbiebl> awesome, libchamplain ftbfs with an ICE in gcc-4.7 <mbiebl> yeah for switching the default compiler <KiBi> doko: It looks like I'm going to take up your offer. Please fix that. <mbiebl> doko: you have your first problem of gcc-4.7 breaking an ongoing transition <adsb> mbiebl: that might be the gmp10 bug <doko> KiBi, can't reproduce the libchamplain ICE locally. could you do a local build as well? and I didn't get a reply on that. strigi was fixed, the gnome-commander and hugin builds were both tried on brahms (and did succeed on other architectures). > What's worse is that at least for the last two, there were no gcc 4.7 bug > reports for them! And don't tell me thins changed for them, since hugin is > getting his *fourth* binNMU in a row. no, because it's a buildd issue, or an gmp issue, afaics. Again, please don't blame the compiler if you can't explain a build failure. so what is the status of brahms? > You're making our job difficult. It's really ***NOT*** appreciated. well, not deciding on the release architectures for over a year now makes my job difficult as well. still trying to get it done. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fa95015.4080...@debian.org