On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote: >>> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >>>>> The intent to get GCC changed was mentioned in the bug reports a >>>>> month ago. >>>> Seeing the number of new bug reports that keep popping up I still >>>> think the switch should be reverted. It was bad enough with all the >>>> month old bugs still open, but with many new ones (plus the >>>> misbuilds) I really don't think it's reasonable to waste yet more >>>> time on this. >> >> which ones? are there any reports which are not tagged? I went through >> the list of Lucas' new batch and tagged the appropriate ones. >> > There were again some more in the last couple days. They should be tagged > AFAIK.
I am only aware of these usertags: debian...@lists.debian.org / qa-ftbfs-20120508 do you known about a new rebuild? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4faff27d.5070...@debian.org
