forwarded 706207 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57080 severity 706207 minor thank you
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:04:30PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> I don't object to this, but somehow I fail to grasp the idea that the >> result depends on architecture and optimization level. > > There are negative number involved. The result is somewhere within > 5.0+-$epsilon depending on order of calculation and other parameters. > >> I would expect consistent results, even consistent *bad* results would be ok. > > Do you have consistent results on _one_ architecture and _one_ > optimization level? I do get the same result on every compilation for every combination of arch-optimization, but I still think the results should not differ with architecture and optimization level. I am lowering the severity and moving the discussion to gcc bugzilla, ok? Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caljhhg91jenw2zdq6qcyx0cu8xhjgs0bvd_uvp58aaqy_jp...@mail.gmail.com
