Mikael Pettersson writes: > > pr49847.diff is not applied yet even though it seems > > to be clear =E2=80=93 I=E2=80=99ve prodded them again a month ago > > and have not received any response yet; maybe just > > nobody feels responsible? > > I was hoping for some gcc maintainer to speak up and say > "yeah that's good" but nothing happended and the patch was > left in limbo. It's absolutely required, though. > > There is another required HAVE_cc0 regression fix, see > <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835#c55>. > I'll submit both after a round of testing in 4.9. > > (The other HAVE_cc0 fix is also in my 4.8 patch kit mentioned below, > as gcc-4.8.0-m68k-ada-pr48835-2.patch.)
Both patches have now been submitted to the gcc-patches mailing list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/21021.51505.931744.775...@pilspetsen.it.uu.se
