At Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:10:53 +0000, Robert Millan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:14:00PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > > Only things I would like to know is: "is debian freebsd community > > agreed with this name scheme and there is a consensus of opinion?". > > > > If you're only guy to work for debian/freebsd, it's OK! :) > > Basicaly I am. Although I don't like the idea of enforcing others > such an abbreviation if they don't like it. > > I'll keep using "KFreeBSD", "FreeBSD's kernel" and "kernel of FreeBSD" > for referring to the same thing. I don't mind which of them other > people tend to use.
Thanks for your effort, I've put it in. But I don't rename filename from "freebsd.mk" to "kfreebsd-gnu.mk", because we use cvs, I'm afraid to lose the modified information. If you encounter debian/freebsd guys, please explain this issue. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
