Your message dated Mon, 3 Nov 2003 06:44:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not an NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Aug 2003 00:11:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 21 19:11:37 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 86.red-80-24-13.pooles.rima-tde.net (aragorn) [80.24.13.86]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19pzWi-0008Kd-00; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 19:11:36 -0500
Received: from rmh by aragorn with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19q1NO-0002Qp-00; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 02:10:06 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1698200901=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: glibc: some GNU/KFreeBSD fixes
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.22
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 02:10:03 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.9 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,RCVD_IN_NJABL,
RCVD_IN_RFCI
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===============1698200901==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: glibc
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-22
Severity: wishlist
This patch includes a few minor fixes to support GNU/KFreeBSD in
the file specific to the Debian package. FreeBSD's kernel (KFreeBSD)
is not supported in upstream sources though (and won't be for a long time).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux aragorn 2.2.25 #1 Fri Jun 20 19:28:33 EST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--===============1698200901==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="/tmp/glibc.diff"
diff -Nur glibc-2.3.2.old/debian/sysdeps/freebsd.mk
glibc-2.3.2/debian/sysdeps/freebsd.mk
--- glibc-2.3.2.old/debian/sysdeps/freebsd.mk 2003-08-22 02:31:49.000000000 +0200
+++ glibc-2.3.2/debian/sysdeps/freebsd.mk 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-threads = yes
-config-os = freebsd-gnu
-add-ons = linuxthreads
-NO_TEST = yes
-extra_config_options := --disable-compatible-utmp --enable-kernel-include=4.6
diff -Nur glibc-2.3.2.old/debian/sysdeps/kfreebsd-gnu.mk
glibc-2.3.2/debian/sysdeps/kfreebsd-gnu.mk
--- glibc-2.3.2.old/debian/sysdeps/kfreebsd-gnu.mk 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000
+0100
+++ glibc-2.3.2/debian/sysdeps/kfreebsd-gnu.mk 2003-08-22 04:57:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+threads = yes
+config-os = kfreebsd-gnu
+add-ons = linuxthreads
+NO_TEST = yes
+extra_config_options := --disable-compatible-utmp --enable-kernel-include=4.6
diff -Nur glibc-2.3.2.old/debian/sysdeps/soname.mk glibc-2.3.2/debian/sysdeps/soname.mk
--- glibc-2.3.2.old/debian/sysdeps/soname.mk 2003-08-22 02:31:49.000000000 +0200
+++ glibc-2.3.2/debian/sysdeps/soname.mk 2003-08-22 04:58:01.000000000 +0200
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),gnu)
libc = libc0.3
else
- ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),freebsd)
+ ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM),kfreebsd-gnu)
libc = libc1
else
libc = libc6
--===============1698200901==--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 206663-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2003 14:44:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 03 08:44:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from marge.v3.ca [216.66.20.89]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AGfws-0006Z6-00; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 08:44:55 -0600
Received: from marge.v3.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by marge.v3.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-0) with ESMTP id hA3EiegS001485;
Mon, 3 Nov 2003 06:44:40 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by marge.v3.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-0) id hA3Eidru001484;
Mon, 3 Nov 2003 06:44:39 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: marge.v3.ca: jbailey set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 06:44:39 -0800
From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not an NMU
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-EMSscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-EMSscan-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-9.009,
required 5, BAYES_00 -4.90, USER_AGENT_MUTT -4.11)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
2.3.2-6 wasn't an NMU, Philip just had the wrong email address in the
changelog. Closing for real.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
