Your message dated Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:36:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libc.so/arm fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2003 20:10:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 21 15:10:05 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pc2-cmbg4-3-cust239.cmbg.cable.ntl.com (kc.cam.armlinux.org)
[81.96.69.239]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19pvkz-00045P-00; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 15:10:05 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by kc.cam.armlinux.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19pvky-0001SD-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:10:04 +0100
Subject: libc.so script busted
From: Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3
Date: 21 Aug 2003 21:10:04 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2-2
Architecture: arm
Severity: serious
This can't be good news:
/* GNU ld script
Use the shared library, but some functions are only in
the static library, so try that secondarily. */
*** BUG in libc/scripts/output-format.sed ***
elf32-bigarm,elf32-littlearm
GROUP ( /lib/libc.so.6 /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a )
I guess we need to fix output-format.sed to handle this somehow.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 206622-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2003 17:36:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 11 12:36:33 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rhenium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.93]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19xVMu-0002tn-00; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:36:32 -0500
Received: from host81-129-36-235.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.129.36.235]
helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by rhenium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23)
id 19xVMt-0001US-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:36:31 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 19xVMs-0004UP-00; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:36:30 +0100
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:36:30 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc.so/arm fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
According to Phil, this has been fixed (or at least worked around) by
debian/patches/arm-output-format.dpatch in glibc 2.3.2-4.
18:32 < Kamion> do you mind if I close #206622 (the libc.so/arm thing,
then)? it's still serious
18:33 < pb_> oh, whoops, I forgot about that. no, please go ahead and
close it.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
