On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:06:24AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote: > > Oddly enough, we aren't idiots: this was deliberate. The release > > manager was perfectly aware that hppa was out of sync. However, a > > huge amount of other stuff was waiting for glibc in testing, and it > > really wasn't practical to wait for hppa any longer. If we get a > > fixed hppa glibc 2.3.2 in time, which is being worked on, it'll go > > into testing. > > I still think that skiping a supported architecture, as well as the > ground rule about syncing everything before allowing a package to > slide down to testing, is a REALLY bad idea, especialy for something > so fundamental as glibc.
Sometimes bad things are a practical necessity. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
