Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:01:48 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#184559: libc6: missing files on sparc64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2003 04:30:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 12 22:30:54 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from acolyte.scowler.net [207.99.30.4]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18tKMn-0001qJ-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:30:53 -0600
Received: from acolyte.scowler.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by acolyte.scowler.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-7) with ESMTP id h2D4UqHv015494
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK);
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:30:52 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by acolyte.scowler.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-7) id h2D4UqVv015493;
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:30:52 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: acolyte.scowler.net: clint set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using -f
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:30:52 -0500
From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: missing files on sparc64
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT,
X_AUTH_WARNING
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-14
Severity: normal
glibc-2.3.1/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/setfsgid.c
and
glibc-2.3.1/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/setfsuid.c
should be copied to the
glibc-2.3.1/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc64/
directory to facilitate the building of libc6-sparc64.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184559-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2004 08:01:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 31 01:01:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BqooQ-00077T-00; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 01:01:50 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id CBDC0DEB58; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:01:48 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:01:48 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#184559: libc6: missing files on sparc64
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
At Thu, 13 Mar 2003 00:16:29 -0500,
Clint Adams wrote:
> > If they truly are the same for either or, then they should just be moved
> > to glibc-2.3.1/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc where it is generic for any
> > sparc (32bit or 64bit).
>
> They're just
>
> #include <sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/setfsuid.c>
> and
> #include <sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/setfsgid.c>
>
> (also the case with arm,cris,m68k,s390-32,sh)
>
> So I imagine they should be moved.
Yes, it should be existed for arm, cris, m68k, s390-32, sparc-32,
sh-32, and i386 because of setfsuid16 issue. And nowadays glibc
2.3.2.ds1-13 has this definition for those architectures. I close
this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
