On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 09:33:19PM +0200, Thibaut Girka wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 09:02:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Your patch actually also makes libc0.1-dev, libc0.3-dev and libc6.1-dev > > m-a: same. You should also check for files in these packages. > > Oh, I didn't know about that. > > libc0.1-dev is ok. > libc0.3-dev is ok since it's only available for one architecture. > libc6.1-dev is ok too. >
Either we have to make them conflict one with another (that is libc0.1-dev and libc6-dev, libc0.3-dev with libc6-dev, etc.), or we have to check for these packages as if they were a single one. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120602195617.gc13...@hall.aurel32.net
