Hi Aurélien, ----- Mail original ----- > Thanks, this happens when glibc is built with binutils >= > 2.45.50.20260119-1, and it's not related to a glibc change. There is > nothing we can do on the glibc side besides a rebuild against a fixed > binutils version, so cloning and reassigning the bug to binutils.
Thanks for your analysis and for having reassign this bug to 'binutils' package. > > See this thread on tinycc-devel ML for reproduction and further > > analysis > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2026-01/msg00029.html > > Thanks for the link. Could you tell me who has been informed on the > "official Debian IRC channel"? If someone already investigated the > issue it would avoid redoing the same work. I don't know, I'm not the original reporter of this issue on the 'tinycc-devel' mailing-list. regards, Laurent
