Your message dated Tue, 3 Feb 2026 23:17:31 +0100 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#1126482: libc6: Conflicting sections .note.GNU-stack in x86_64-linux-gnu/crt1.o has caused the Debian Bug report #1126482, regarding libc6: Conflicting sections .note.GNU-stack in x86_64-linux-gnu/crt1.o to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 1126482: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1126482 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: libc6 Version: 2.42-10+b1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, with the latest version 2.42-10+b1 of libc6* package on Debian/testing amd64, there is an issue to compile some C code with tcc compiler using /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/crt1.o file. In this file, there is 2 conflicting sections for ".note.GNU-stack": one with NOTE(7) type and one with PROGBITS(10) type. $ readelf -S /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/crt1.o There are 15 section headers, starting at offset 0x370: Section Headers: [Nr] Name Type Address Offset Size EntSize Flags Link Info Align [ 0] NULL 0000000000000000 00000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0 0 0 [ 1] .text PROGBITS 0000000000000000 00000040 0000000000000031 0000000000000000 AX 0 0 16 [ 2] .rela.text RELA 0000000000000000 00000290 0000000000000030 0000000000000018 I 12 1 8 [ 3] .eh_frame PROGBITS 0000000000000000 00000078 000000000000005c 0000000000000000 A 0 0 8 [ 4] .rela.eh_frame RELA 0000000000000000 000002c0 0000000000000030 0000000000000018 I 12 3 8 [ 5] .data PROGBITS 0000000000000000 000000d4 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 WA 0 0 1 [ 6] .bss NOBITS 0000000000000000 000000d8 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 WA 0 0 1 [ 7] .note.GNU-stack NOTE 0000000000000000 000000d8 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0 0 1 [ 8] .note.gnu.pr[...] NOTE 0000000000000000 000000d8 0000000000000020 0000000000000000 A 0 0 8 [ 9] .note.ABI-tag NOTE 0000000000000000 000000f8 0000000000000020 0000000000000000 A 0 0 4 [10] .note.GNU-stack PROGBITS 0000000000000000 00000118 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0 0 1 [11] .rodata.cst4 PROGBITS 0000000000000000 00000118 0000000000000004 0000000000000004 AM 0 0 4 [12] .symtab SYMTAB 0000000000000000 00000120 0000000000000108 0000000000000018 13 3 8 [13] .strtab STRTAB 0000000000000000 00000228 0000000000000067 0000000000000000 0 0 1 [14] .shstrtab STRTAB 0000000000000000 000002f0 000000000000007e 0000000000000000 0 0 1 Key to Flags: W (write), A (alloc), X (execute), M (merge), S (strings), I (info), L (link order), O (extra OS processing required), G (group), T (TLS), C (compressed), x (unknown), o (OS specific), E (exclude), D (mbind), l (large), p (processor specific) See this thread on tinycc-devel ML for reproduction and further analysis https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2026-01/msg00029.html On my Debian/testing (amd64), binutils installed version = 2.45.50.20251209-1+b1 regards, Laurent -- System Information: Debian Release: forky/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.12.38+deb13-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libc-gconv-modules-extra 2.42-10+b1 ii libgcc-s1 15.2.0-12 Versions of packages libc6 recommends: ii libidn2-0 2.3.8-4+b1 Versions of packages libc6 suggests: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.91 pn glibc-doc <none> ii libc-l10n 2.42-10 ii libnss-nis 3.1-5+b2 ii libnss-nisplus 1.3-5+b3 ii locales 2.42-10 -- debconf information excluded
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 2.42-11+b1 Hi, On 2026-01-28 19:34, Laurent Cheylus wrote: > Hi Aurélien, > > ----- Mail original ----- > > Thanks, this happens when glibc is built with binutils >= > > 2.45.50.20260119-1, and it's not related to a glibc change. There is > > nothing we can do on the glibc side besides a rebuild against a fixed > > binutils version, so cloning and reassigning the bug to binutils. > > Thanks for your analysis and for having reassign this bug to 'binutils' > package. > > > > See this thread on tinycc-devel ML for reproduction and further > > > analysis > > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2026-01/msg00029.html > > > > Thanks for the link. Could you tell me who has been informed on the > > "official Debian IRC channel"? If someone already investigated the > > issue it would avoid redoing the same work. > > I don't know, I'm not the original reporter of this issue on the > 'tinycc-devel' mailing-list. The bug has been fixed on the binutils side. glibc has been rebuilt against this fixed version, therefore libc6-dev 2.42-11+b1 does not have the issue anymore. This version is currently in unstable and should migrate to testing soon. Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://aurel32.net
--- End Message ---
