On 7/28/21 7:07 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > > On 7/28/21 1:57 PM, Peymaneh Nejad wrote: >> Hi >> >>>> There is already an antlr4 in the archive[1] >>>> IMHO, these bindings should be built in the same source itself as a >>>> separate binary package >>>> >>>> I think packaging it separately goes orthogonal to the effort if the >>>> maintainer decides to package the bindings someday >>>> If the maintainer agrees that bindings should be separate source package, >>>> your method would be fine. >>>> >>>> But I think contacting the maintainer first should be the bare minimum >>>> requirement here. >>>> I think just send in a mail to the -java mailing list >>>> and CC the maintainer to ask for opinions >> >> It's maintainer would like to keep the sources seperate: >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2021/07/msg00014.html > > Hmm, there's been discussion about including it in the original source too > which is opposite to what ebourg says, > but I think we'll go with what ebourg suggests. > > In the source, IMO .appveyor, .github, .travis, .gitignore pom.xml .... et al > files are also pretty much useless for go package, atleast for us as > downstream - can you filter these too?
Other than this, please add in a d/README.Source explaining what parts you filtered out and your reasoning for doing the same IMO, we don't need to add in a repack suffix here because that would be needless work, so adding a source readme should suffice Nilesh
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
