Am 14.07.26 um 06:40 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > I see caddy on that list which is arch:any and can be binNMUed. It also does > not have any -dev package so I'm not sure what benefit installing go.mod > will have here. > > I can see some other packages like this (aptly for instance) also. Was the > list not checked for arch:any packages or do I miss something here?
Hi Nilesh, no, you don't miss anything. You're right, I did not think of excluding packages which are arch:any. Sorry about that. I've now tried to query UDD for arch:all packages, but unfortunately, it's not that easy. With the new query, there are still e.g. -doc packages in the result list, which are arch:all, of course, but don't need a rebuild. I don't know how to solve this quickly. My recommendation would be to just upload packages from the golang-* namespace and check first if they build a -dev package with the .go source code files. I've just updated the Wiki page (thanks Andrew!) to help prioritizing the packages which most likely need a new upload. Regards, Tobias
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
