Dear Toddy, On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 5:05 PM Dr. Tobias Quathamer <[email protected]> wrote: > maybe, I'm not sure. It's probably a good start to check if those > packages are still needed, or if they could be removed from the archive > without breaking reverse dependencies.
Right. We should put them into a list for clean up later. > In any case, I'd defer working on those packages right now, because I > think that including go.mod files which are provided by upstream would > be more important. True. > Currently, dh-golang deals with packages not having a go.mod file by > creating a minimal go.mod file with just the module name in it (to mimic > what the go compiler does). Thanks to explain the solution in dh-golang here. Best regards, -- -Andrew
