On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 11:00, Ross Burton wrote: > On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 15:09, Joe Drew wrote: > > I'm writing to propose that, once all GNOME 2.2 packages are in unstable > > (I know that I have not gotten the full 2.2 version of some of my > > packages created yet), we close this bug and allow GNOME 2 to flow into > > testing whenever the current testing situation is sorted out. > > What packages are you thinking of?
gedit in particular, but your point of gdm is a good one. > I also think that gthumb should be removed, and gthumb2 renamed to > gthumb. Of course, gthumb2 does have some critical packaging bugs atm... > I might have to create some patches, as I use gthumb. File bugs on gthumb2 where the problems exist, and file another bug on gthumb saying that it should be updated to the GNOME 2 version. Ensure to get a bug filed on ftp.debian.org to get gthumb2 removed once gthumb is updated. (Although gthumb is not part of GNOME 2.2 as released by GNOME, the consensus is not to have *2 GNOME packages in Debian.)
