Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...] > gedit in particular, but your point of gdm is a good one. > > > I also think that gthumb should be removed, and gthumb2 renamed to > > gthumb. Of course, gthumb2 does have some critical packaging bugs atm... > > I might have to create some patches, as I use gthumb. > > File bugs on gthumb2 where the problems exist, and file another bug on > gthumb saying that it should be updated to the GNOME 2 version. That won't be possible until upstream migrates to the Gnome 2.2 version of gnome-print. Or has this happened in the meantime? Johannes -- ~/.signature under construction
