Am Dienstag, den 18.06.2013, 11:08 +0200 schrieb Jordi Mallach: > El dt 18 de 06 de 2013 a les 08:50 +0200, en/na Johannes Rohr va > escriure: > > Now, maybe there is a good reason to include this package into the GNOME > > desktop metapackage, but if there is one, I'd like to know what it is. What > > is the rationale behind this decision? How do you define what is part of > > GNOME and what isn't? > > meta-gnome3 (1:3.4+3) unstable; urgency=low > > [...] > > * Install iceweasel instead of epiphany :( > See bug#682481. > * Let gnome recommend iceweasel-l10n-all. > * Require firefox extensions that match epiphany functionality: > keyring, adblock.
Thanks for filling me in! At the same time, there seem to be no open security related RC bugs file against epiphany in Debian at this time: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=epiphany-browser;tag=security Thanks, Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1371549322.23281.2.camel@localhost
