On 2015-01-09, Joachim Breitner <nome...@debian.org> wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 09.01.2015, 13:09 +0000 schrieb Dmitry Bogatov: >> cabal-debian creates package that is nice, but requires repetive adjustme= > nts to >> DHG standards. > > then let=E2=80=99s change that! > > What repetetive requirements are there that are not yet reported at > https://github.com/ddssff/cabal-debian/issues ?
Non-exhaustive list: #. Generated debian/control should use X-description and blurbs #. Absent debian/source/format #. debian/changelog mentions upstream maintainer, not me #. I would prefer section by default `unknown` #. Compat is 9, but debhelper depends >= 7.0 #. Priority is optional, extra is prefered. Well, this list may continue, if I notice something else repetive in my workflow, so, despite my belive, that this is nice list to fix, I would like to have ability fix it myself with library. -- Best regards, Dmitry Bogatov <kact...@gnu.org>, Free Software supporter, esperantisto and netiquette guardian. GPG: 54B7F00D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnmavur6.tni.kact...@self.kaction.name
