On 2015-01-09, Joachim Breitner <nome...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > > looks like you are not using the git version of cabal-debian or are not > using the "--official" flag... >> Non-exhaustive list: > that works. > [...]
Sounds nice. But HEAD is one commit from 4.19. Maybe package it? I tried, and it depends on debian-3.85. I `cabal unpack debian` it, and there is debian/ in it. What should I do with it? But if cabal-debian-4.19 is really so nice, I would agree, that I was wrong and my commit should be reverted. `darcs rollback`, right? And I have another question. Let's imagine following session: pkg-haskell-checkout haskell-foo cd haskell-foo-1.0 uscan --verbose cd .. tar xfv foo-2.0.tar.gz mv foo-2.0 haskell-foo-2.0 cd haskell-foo-2.0 mv ../haskell-foo-1.0/debian . debchange --newversion 2.0-1 debuild -us -uc Question: Is it shorter way to follow upstream upgrade? -- Best regards, Dmitry Bogatov <kact...@gnu.org>, Free Software supporter, esperantisto and netiquette guardian. GPG: 54B7F00D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnmb0782.1rj.kact...@self.kaction.name