On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 07:12:02PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:57:20AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:05:44PM -0700, Jeremy Shaw wrote: > > > > > > I have a first cut of a template for cabalizing and debianizing > > > haskell libraries. > > > > I haven't had a good look, but I note you use dh_haskell. Personally I > > don't see the attraction of dh_haskell over update-haskell-control. The > > latter can be used to keep build-deps in sync as well as deps (and the > > fact that dh_haskell looks like it still incorrectly generates deps like > > ghc6 (<< 6.4.1-999) at least 7 months after I first talked about it with > > That's because I still don't understand why your suggestion is better. > But I'm sitting in a train station right now, and will have to look at > this more when I get back home.
Two reasons: * The info comes from the compiler packager * It doesn't break should ghc6 6.4.1-1000 be released. I thought I'd convinced you in http://meme.b9.com/cview.html?channel=haskell&date=050816 (search for 999), but if you still disagree then please let me know. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ debian-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://urchin.earth.li/mailman/listinfo/debian-haskell
