Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2008, 16:40 +0100 schrieb Ian Lynagh: > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 06:40:20PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote: > > Package: ghc6-doc > > > > (forwarding <https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235036> to you), summary: > > Thanks for forwarding it, Stefan. > > > while ghc6-doc provides html pages showing the library sources, it would be > > nice if it could also ship the plain source files which used to be found in > > ghc6-libsrc. That way the source files could be browsed with a text editor > > and > > not just via the browser. > > Personally I think that the HTMLised sources in the documentation plus > "apt-get source" is enough. > > I also don't see why it makes sense to do this for the libraries that > happen to need to come in the ghc6 packages, but not all the other > libraries; e.g. I think the source for mtl is at least as likely to be > wanted as the source for process. But putting a copy of the whole source > package in one of the binary packages feels wrong to me. > > Any other opinions?
How about a tool that de-htmlizes the htmlized source, shipped with ghc6-doc? Then there is no need to add more text files and we get this feature for all packages shipping hscoloured files. Additional points if this tool, if given a module name instead of a file name, finds the location of the htmlized source itself. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ debian-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://urchin.earth.li/mailman/listinfo/debian-haskell
