Hello, I noticed that haskell-utils looks in two places to get the package name. update-haskell-control uses the cabal package name and scripts/10/rules uses the information from changelog. I like the idea of querying the cabal name, but I think they should both get it from just one place, to avoid:
dpkg-source -b Cabal-1.4.0.2 dpkg-source: error: source package has two conflicting values - haskell-cabal and haskell-cabal-1.4 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: dpkg-source -b Cabal-1.4.0.2 gave error exit status 255 I know this case is not standard and in cases like this I could edit the generated debian/control file, but still I don't see any reason for getting the package name from two different places. What do you think about it? Greetings. -- marcot Página: http://marcotmarcot.iaaeee.org/ Blog: http://marcotmarcot.blogspot.com/ Correio: [EMAIL PROTECTED] XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefone: 25151920 Celular: 98116720 Endereço: Rua Turfa, 639/701 Prado 30410-370 Belo Horizonte/MG Brasil _______________________________________________ debian-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://urchin.earth.li/mailman/listinfo/debian-haskell
