Op vrijdag 03-10-2008 om 11:17 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > I noticed that haskell-utils looks in two places to get the package > name. update-haskell-control uses the cabal package name and > scripts/10/rules uses the information from changelog. I like the idea > of querying the cabal name, but I think they should both get it from > just one place, to avoid: > > dpkg-source -b Cabal-1.4.0.2 > dpkg-source: error: source package has two conflicting values - > haskell-cabal and haskell-cabal-1.4 > dpkg-buildpackage: failure: dpkg-source -b Cabal-1.4.0.2 gave error exit > status 255 > > I know this case is not standard and in cases like this I could edit the > generated debian/control file, but still I don't see any reason for > getting the package name from two different places.
I noticed that not getting the package name from cabal breaks the dependencies, cause they are generated from the cabal package name. So I think this cabal-1.4 case is very distinct, and it doesn't make sense to change the way haskell-utils generates the package name just because of cases like this. Greetings. -- marcot Página: http://marcotmarcot.iaaeee.org/ Blog: http://marcotmarcot.blogspot.com/ Correio: [EMAIL PROTECTED] XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefone: 25151920 Celular: 98116720 Endereço: Rua Turfa, 639/701 Prado 30410-370 Belo Horizonte/MG Brasil _______________________________________________ debian-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://urchin.earth.li/mailman/listinfo/debian-haskell
