On Sat, 18 May 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > It's useful to have such a standard, that's why it's specified in the > GNU Coding Standard. I don't think the FHS is a good standard > however. The fact is that the loader in *BSD is in libexec and that's > part of the ABI. It isn't in GNU/Hurd, I don't know why, maybe to be > compatible with GNU/Linux or for some other reason.
Why not just use /libexec, for hurd, and be done with it? Why force the rest of Debian to require use of it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
