Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Many people in debian-hurd have particular opinions about what FHS > > should look like, but that's an entirely separate issue, and is not > > even a Debian issue at all. > > Going about modifying policy first is forcing the rest of Debian.
Of course you are right. We don't need to say that there is a /libexec in order for the Hurd to work right. The Hurd does not depend on /libexec. The current packages for some core Hurd components happen to use /libexec. Obviously as long as this is inconsistent with policy, Debian GNU/Hurd is not ready for release. It would be quite possible for /libexec to be an option, and not a requirement (heck, it would be really cool if there could be a way to specify it by debconf). But none of this is relevant to the Hurd, as far as I can tell. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
