Emile van Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You're reasoning based on authority *again*. Why? Nobody is telling > anybody to do anything.
I think it's the right design decision for the Hurd. So, in fact, do all the other Hurd developers that have said anything on the subject. > However, the FHS itself does not currently define such criteria AFAIK, > and I assume the people in charge of it are wise enough to consider any > *good* suggestion for "good general criteria", whether originated by > Thomas Bushnell, BSG, or J. Random Hacker, yours truly, or a collection > of people who happened to be on debian-hurd and debian-devel at a > particular moment in time. I think the FHS would be making a serious mistake if it decided to establish "good general criteria". I can see no useful value that such criteria would serve. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
