* [Jeff Bailey] > What that means for us is that there are 1200 packages (out of about > 6000) or so that haven't yet been seen. My guess is that we'll chew > through this in the next couple of weeks. At that point, I'll begin > my second pass to try and build packages that failed just because they > were missing dependancies.
Great! Can't wait till woody gets out the door, so we can lobby for getting hurd-i386 back on the stats page :) > there? *g* - Hmm.. I should find my Pink Floyd album) I know Marcus > was sending out [Job] emails, but it seems tedious to send out 100 of > those a day (which I suspect is on the low side). If you were to (by some smart scripting) carpet bomb the BTS with these bugs, would it then be possible to get a list of those out again, using the search system on bugs.debian.org? Alas, the BTS search engine seems not to want to search on actual contents of bug messages, but perhaps if you used a special address when submitting, the "submitter email" search could be used. Or would this kind of mass bugging be considered rude, and just make a lot of people irritated and uncooperative? Oystein -- When in doubt: Think again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
