--- Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 04:40:35PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > > Of course you are right. But we know this since two years, and there are > > still packages which have this problem. > > > > So, how many bug reports have you filed today? ;) > > we could spot and fill a lot more if libc0.3* didn't have provides: on > libc6*. has anyone speaken with BenC about this? > > -- > Robert Millan >
I don't think it does. The any glibc dev package provides libc-dev, not libc6-dev. ===== James Morrison University of Waterloo Computer Science - Digital Hardware 2A co-op http://hurd.dyndns.org Anyone referring to this as 'Open Source' shall be eaten by a GNU __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com