> 1) no ssh > 2) ssh with no security > > you have advocated (2), right? It is that statement which I am > arguing against. > > No, I have advocated against including a unsecure random translator. > You are forgetting the third alternative, making ssh use its own > random pool. Assuming that it is possible, if it is possible then > this is the best solution.
There is a fourth alternative: leave everything the way it is. If you need some quality entropy copy it from e.g. a GNU/Linux system.
