What's the point of installing a shiny new toy like IPv6 if you can't get some instant gratification from it by connecting to an IPv6 site? Seriously, a IPv6-only mirror of both ftp.d.o and www.d.o might be a nice thing: in fact, it might encourage IPv6 adoption at first by promising a less-congested server to update/upgrade from. Now if only apt wouldn't stomp all over my nice v6 installation every time the v4 package gets a new version....(who, ME? carp?)
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > > Previously Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > We could just use a debian.org machine that actually has lots of space and > > > bandwidth, va.d.o is good for instance. > > > > va isn't reachable via ipv6 I think? > > It isn't, but that doesn't matter for hosting an archive of packages. > > Jason > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- You have paid nothing for the preceding, therefore it's worth every penny you've paid for it: if you did pay for it, might I remind you of the immortal words of Phineas Taylor Barnum regarding fools and money? Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who!